depletion antibodies anti mouse cd8α Search Results


94
Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd cell suspension
Cell Suspension, supplied by Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/Anti-Mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pm39613121-96-1-28
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell suspension - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio-Rad mouse anti cd8α
Mouse Anti Cd8α, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/Mouse+anti+Rabbit+CD8/pmc06261659-180-17-21
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti cd8α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson apc rat anti-mouse cd8 α
Apc Rat Anti Mouse Cd8 α, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/anti+cd3/pmc09279642-55-30-52
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc rat anti-mouse cd8 α - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-cd8 α (lyt-2
Anti Cd8 α (Lyt 2, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/anti+cd8+abs/pmc01808918-55-11-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-cd8 α (lyt-2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-mouse cd8α v500 (53-6.7)
NKG2A Is an Inhibitory Receptor that Blocks the Anti-tumor Efficacy of NK and CD8 + T Cells (A) Qa-1 b -sufficient or -deficient A20 tumor cells were engrafted subcutaneously (s.c.) in BALB/c mice. (B) BALB/c mice were treated with an anti-aGM1 pAbs or with control rabbit serum, an <t>anti-CD8α</t> mAb, or rat IgG2b isotype control and then subcutaneously engrafted with A20 tumor cells. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual mouse and combined survival curves. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0020; ns, no significant. (C) Experiment similar to that in (B), but with Qa-1 b KO A20 tumor cells. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0002 (NK cell depletion) and ∗∗∗ p = 0.0006 (CD8 + T cell depletion). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " width="250" height="auto" />
Anti Mouse Cd8α V500 (53 6.7), supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/anti+cd19/pmc06292840-38-0-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-mouse cd8α v500 (53-6.7) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti mouse cd8α rabbit monoclonal antibody
Figure 3. Immunizations with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant signifi- cantly increases the density of CD8+ T cells that infiltrate into implanted MC38 tumors. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC-treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. As a control, mice were immunized with PBS as a negative control. Two weeks after the second immunization, mice were challenged with a subcuta- neous implantation of 1 × 106 cells of replication-capable MC38 CRC cells. MC38 tumors grown in these two groups of mice were surgically resected on Day 9, Day 11, and Day 15 after its challenge implantation, and those tumors were applied for immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD4 and <t>anti-CD8α</t> antibodies. The density of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (numbers of those intratumoral T cells/mm2 of tumor) that had infiltrated into the tumors were counted microscopically by scanning each section of MC 38 tumors at 200× magnification from one end to the other end of the tumor sections at three different locations (approximately one fourth from the top of the section, the middle of the section, and three fourths from the top of the section). When the tumors are too small to measure the T cell numbers to scan at the three different locations described above, the scanning was performed at only the middle of the section or one third and two third from the top of the section. (A) The density of intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumors grown in the immunized and unimmunized mice. In the unimmunized control group, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and two mice on Day 15. In the immunized mice, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and one mouse on Day 15. The figure shows the data from all of these mice combined for each experimental group. (B) A representative image of CD8+ T cells detected within the tumors of the immunized and unimmunized mice on Day 9 after the implantation of the tumor cells. Arrows indicate CD8+ T cells detected. * p < 0.05. N.S., Not significant.
Anti Mouse Cd8α Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/CD8alpha+XP+Rabbit+mAb/pm38247803-63-22-27
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd8α rabbit monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio-Rad mouse antifeline cd8 α β phycoerythrin monoclonal antibodies
Figure 3. Immunizations with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant signifi- cantly increases the density of CD8+ T cells that infiltrate into implanted MC38 tumors. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC-treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. As a control, mice were immunized with PBS as a negative control. Two weeks after the second immunization, mice were challenged with a subcuta- neous implantation of 1 × 106 cells of replication-capable MC38 CRC cells. MC38 tumors grown in these two groups of mice were surgically resected on Day 9, Day 11, and Day 15 after its challenge implantation, and those tumors were applied for immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD4 and <t>anti-CD8α</t> antibodies. The density of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (numbers of those intratumoral T cells/mm2 of tumor) that had infiltrated into the tumors were counted microscopically by scanning each section of MC 38 tumors at 200× magnification from one end to the other end of the tumor sections at three different locations (approximately one fourth from the top of the section, the middle of the section, and three fourths from the top of the section). When the tumors are too small to measure the T cell numbers to scan at the three different locations described above, the scanning was performed at only the middle of the section or one third and two third from the top of the section. (A) The density of intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumors grown in the immunized and unimmunized mice. In the unimmunized control group, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and two mice on Day 15. In the immunized mice, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and one mouse on Day 15. The figure shows the data from all of these mice combined for each experimental group. (B) A representative image of CD8+ T cells detected within the tumors of the immunized and unimmunized mice on Day 9 after the implantation of the tumor cells. Arrows indicate CD8+ T cells detected. * p < 0.05. N.S., Not significant.
Mouse Antifeline Cd8 α β Phycoerythrin Monoclonal Antibodies, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/Rat+anti+Mouse+CD8+Alpha/pmc11112254-155-32-39
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse antifeline cd8 α β phycoerythrin monoclonal antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8
A MC38 cells lacking Tak1 or B2m expression were pulsed with the MHC-I restricted chicken ovalbumin SIINFEKL peptide and subsequently cultured with increasing ratios of OT-I <t>CD8</t> T cells, previously activated for 48 h by CD3 and CD28 stimulation. Tumor cell viability was assessed 24 h later by flow cytometry, using CD8 surface staining to discriminate T cells from tumor cells. B – D CD8 T cells isolated from naïve mouse spleens (Balb/c for CT-26 and EMT6, C57BL/6 for MC38) were activated by CD3 and CD28 stimulation in vitro and subsequently cultured with ( B ) MC38, ( C ) CT-26, or ( D ) EMT6 tumor cells lacking Tak1 expression. Viability was assessed using DRAQ7 uptake, imaging cells every 2 h for the indicated times. E – G Tak1- deficient MC38 ( E ) or CT-26 ( F ) cells were cultured in media derived from 48 h activated CD-8 T cells. Viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. G Conditioned media from 48 h activated CD8 T cells was added to EMT6 cells deficient for Tak1 , Tnfr1 , or Tak1 and Tnfr1 and viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. All panels represent the mean +/− SD from a single experiment, n = 2 independent experiments.
Anti Mouse Cd8, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/InVivoPlus+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pmc12532812-338-9-11
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8α 2 43 depletion
(A–E) ATs from naïve C57BL/6 mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative plots of transcription factor expression or cytokine production by CD8+ or CD4+ T cells from the mAT after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA. (B) Numbers of CD8+ T cells and non-Treg CD4+ T cells from the mAT producing the indicated cytokine. (C) Frequencies of IFN-γ- and TNF-α-producing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA isolated from gAT, scAT, and mAT. (D) CD8+ (top) and CD4+ (bottom) T cells isolated from the mAT. Left: representative plots of CD44 and CD62L expression, Right: representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD44+CD62L− (red) or CD44−CD62L+ (blue) T cells. (E) Numbers of central memory (Tcm: CD44+CD62L+), effector memory (Tem: CD44+CD62L−CD69−) and resident memory (Trm: CD44+CD62L−CD69+) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells per gram of gAT, scAT, and mAT. (F) Conjoined pairs of naïve CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic C57BL/6 mice were analyzed 6 weeks after parabiosis surgery to quantify the origin of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets (described in (E)) in the spleen (Spl), mLN, siLP, and mAT. The percentage of cells originating from host (black bars) or donor (white bars) animals is shown. nd not detected. (G–K) mAT isolated from healthy rhesus macaques was analyzed by flow cytometry. (G) Representative plot (gated on CD3+CD8+ T cells) indicating the gating strategy for naïve (CD95−CD28lo), central memory or stem cell memory (Tcm/scm) (CD95+CD28+), and Tem/rm (CD95+CD28−) T cells. (H) Representative plots showing CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve, Tcm/scm, and Tem/rm T cells. (I) Representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve (shaded) and Tem/rm T cells (blue). (J) Frequencies of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets from (HI). (K) Representative plots (gated on CD3+ T cells) from concatenation of all samples, showing cytokine production by T cell subsets. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. In all bar graphs, error bars represent standard deviation. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with at least 4 mice, 3 pairs of parabiotic animals, or a total of 3 rhesus macaques. See Figure S1.
Anti Mouse Cd8α 2 43 Depletion, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pmc05773068-164-0-5
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd8α 2 43 depletion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8 abs
Fig. 1 Pharmacological inhibition of BCL9 induces tumor regression and increases antigen presentation. a The BCL9 expression between tumors and normal tissues in TCGA COAD datasets (Normal, n = 41; Tumor, n = 462). b The antigen processing and presentation signature (left) and HLA-I signature (right) between low and high BCL9 expression (median value) in TCGA COAD datasets (BCL9Low , n = 209; BCL9High, n = 236). c Tumor growth of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (n = 6). d Tumor growth of MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation (n = 6). e Heatmap of the genes included in the GO:0019882 from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors (Vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). f, g The relative expression of Tap1, Tap2, B2m and Psmb9 of tumors from hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (f) and MC38 tumor- bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (g) analyzed by qPCR (n = 4–7). h–k Representative plot (h, j) and quantitative analysis (i, k) of OVA257-264-specific <t>CD8+</t> T cells in TILs of tumors from MC38-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (h, i) and hsBCL9z96-treated MC38- OVA tumor-bearing mice (j, k) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3). l Tumor growth of C57BL/6 WT (n = 6) and Batf3−/−mice (n = 5) that had been injected subcutaneously with MC38 tumor cells and were treated i.p. with vehicle or 40 mg/kg hsBCL9z96 every day for 2 weeks. These data are representative values expressed as the mean ± SD of each group; n indicates biological replicate; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Unpaired Student’s t test (a, b, i, k); Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (c, d, f, g)
Anti Mouse Cd8 Abs, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pm38811552-204-24-31
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd8 abs - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Bio X Cell anti mouse cd8α antibody
METTL3 is highly expressed in tumors and is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. (A) Flowchart for screening key N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification genes related to immunotherapy response in bladder cancer (BLCA). (B) Pearson correlation analysis bar chart of the 10 target genes with the percentage of complete response (CR) patients to immunotherapy in the IMvigor210 cohort, and a scatter plot of METTL3 expression level versus CR patient percentage. (C) Proportion of immunotherapy responses among different Lund subtypes in the IMvigor210 cohort. (D) Violin plot of METTL3 expression levels in bladder tissues of patients with different Lund subtypes. (E–F) Expression and statistical analysis of METTL3 in normal and tumor cells from single-cell sequencing of clinical bladder cancer samples. Histogram of METTL3 expression levels in cancer tissues versus adjacent normal tissues in (G) non-paired samples and (H) paired samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer cohort. (I) Representative immunohistochemistry staining of METTL3 in clinical BLCA samples. (J–K) Scatter plots of METTL3 expression levels with CD8+T cell, cytotoxic cell, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration levels based on ssGSEA algorithm and TIMER V.2.0 database. (L) Statistical plot of METTL3 expression levels and immune scores in BLCA from the CAMOIP database. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Anti Mouse Cd8α Antibody, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/RecombiMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pmc12001370-45-10-13
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd8α antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell anti cd8
METTL3 is highly expressed in tumors and is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. (A) Flowchart for screening key N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification genes related to immunotherapy response in bladder cancer (BLCA). (B) Pearson correlation analysis bar chart of the 10 target genes with the percentage of complete response (CR) patients to immunotherapy in the IMvigor210 cohort, and a scatter plot of METTL3 expression level versus CR patient percentage. (C) Proportion of immunotherapy responses among different Lund subtypes in the IMvigor210 cohort. (D) Violin plot of METTL3 expression levels in bladder tissues of patients with different Lund subtypes. (E–F) Expression and statistical analysis of METTL3 in normal and tumor cells from single-cell sequencing of clinical bladder cancer samples. Histogram of METTL3 expression levels in cancer tissues versus adjacent normal tissues in (G) non-paired samples and (H) paired samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer cohort. (I) Representative immunohistochemistry staining of METTL3 in clinical BLCA samples. (J–K) Scatter plots of METTL3 expression levels with CD8+T cell, cytotoxic cell, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration levels based on ssGSEA algorithm and TIMER V.2.0 database. (L) Statistical plot of METTL3 expression levels and immune scores in BLCA from the CAMOIP database. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.
Anti Cd8, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/depletion+antibodies+anti+mouse+cd8%CE%B1/InVivoMAb+anti-mouse+CD8%CE%B1/pm35418470-74-15-16
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


NKG2A Is an Inhibitory Receptor that Blocks the Anti-tumor Efficacy of NK and CD8 + T Cells (A) Qa-1 b -sufficient or -deficient A20 tumor cells were engrafted subcutaneously (s.c.) in BALB/c mice. (B) BALB/c mice were treated with an anti-aGM1 pAbs or with control rabbit serum, an anti-CD8α mAb, or rat IgG2b isotype control and then subcutaneously engrafted with A20 tumor cells. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual mouse and combined survival curves. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0020; ns, no significant. (C) Experiment similar to that in (B), but with Qa-1 b KO A20 tumor cells. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0002 (NK cell depletion) and ∗∗∗ p = 0.0006 (CD8 + T cell depletion). See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 . " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: NKG2A Is an Inhibitory Receptor that Blocks the Anti-tumor Efficacy of NK and CD8 + T Cells (A) Qa-1 b -sufficient or -deficient A20 tumor cells were engrafted subcutaneously (s.c.) in BALB/c mice. (B) BALB/c mice were treated with an anti-aGM1 pAbs or with control rabbit serum, an anti-CD8α mAb, or rat IgG2b isotype control and then subcutaneously engrafted with A20 tumor cells. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual mouse and combined survival curves. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0020; ns, no significant. (C) Experiment similar to that in (B), but with Qa-1 b KO A20 tumor cells. Complete regressions are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0002 (NK cell depletion) and ∗∗∗ p = 0.0006 (CD8 + T cell depletion). See also Figure S1 .

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α V500 (53-6.7) , BD Biosciences , Cat#560776; RRID: AB_1937317.

Techniques:

Combined Blockade of NKG2A and PD-1/PD-L1 Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity in A20 Tumor-Bearing BALB/c Mice (A) Flow cytometry characterization of NK and CD8 + TILs 19 days after A20 tumor cells engraftment. The spleen was used as control. Upper panels: representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) profiles of PD-1 and NKG2A expression on NK and CD8 + T cells in the spleen and the tumor bed. Lower panels: pie chart analysis (mean ± SD). The data presented are the pooled results of three independent experiments (n = 12). (B) A20 tumor cells were engrafted in BALB/c mice. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated at 3- to 4-day intervals with an isotype control (IC), anti-NKG2A, anti-PD-L1, or a combination of these last two mAbs. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual mouse and combined survival curves. The data presented are the pooled results of three independent experiments. Complete regression are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0087; ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (C) Experiment similar to that described in (B) but with treatment of the mice with an anti-asialo-GM1 pAbs or an anti-CD8α mAb 1 day before the initiation of immunotherapy with the combination of anti-NKG2A and anti-PD-L1 mAbs. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. Complete regression are indicated. log rank test, ∗ p < 0.0016; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S2 . " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: Combined Blockade of NKG2A and PD-1/PD-L1 Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity in A20 Tumor-Bearing BALB/c Mice (A) Flow cytometry characterization of NK and CD8 + TILs 19 days after A20 tumor cells engraftment. The spleen was used as control. Upper panels: representative fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) profiles of PD-1 and NKG2A expression on NK and CD8 + T cells in the spleen and the tumor bed. Lower panels: pie chart analysis (mean ± SD). The data presented are the pooled results of three independent experiments (n = 12). (B) A20 tumor cells were engrafted in BALB/c mice. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated at 3- to 4-day intervals with an isotype control (IC), anti-NKG2A, anti-PD-L1, or a combination of these last two mAbs. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual mouse and combined survival curves. The data presented are the pooled results of three independent experiments. Complete regression are indicated. log rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0087; ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001; ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (C) Experiment similar to that described in (B) but with treatment of the mice with an anti-asialo-GM1 pAbs or an anti-CD8α mAb 1 day before the initiation of immunotherapy with the combination of anti-NKG2A and anti-PD-L1 mAbs. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. Complete regression are indicated. log rank test, ∗ p < 0.0016; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001. See also Figure S2 .

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α V500 (53-6.7) , BD Biosciences , Cat#560776; RRID: AB_1937317.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, FACS, Expressing

The Combined Blockade of NKG2A and PD-1/PD-L1 Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity in A20 Tumor-Bearing BALB/c Mice, Related to <xref ref-type=Figure 2 (A) A20 tumor cells were engrafted in BALB/c mice. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated at three- to four-day intervals with isotype control (IC) antibody, anti-NKG2A antibody, anti-PD-1 antibody or a combination of these last two antibodies. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. The data presented are the pooled results of two independent experiments. Log-rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0087, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (B) Experiment similar to that described in (A) but with treatment of the mice with an anti-asialo-GM1 pAbs or an anti-CD8α mAb one day before the initiation of immunotherapy. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. Log Rank test, ∗ p < 0.0016, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001. " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: The Combined Blockade of NKG2A and PD-1/PD-L1 Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity in A20 Tumor-Bearing BALB/c Mice, Related to Figure 2 (A) A20 tumor cells were engrafted in BALB/c mice. Tumor-bearing mice were then treated at three- to four-day intervals with isotype control (IC) antibody, anti-NKG2A antibody, anti-PD-1 antibody or a combination of these last two antibodies. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. The data presented are the pooled results of two independent experiments. Log-rank test, ∗∗ p = 0.0087, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001. (B) Experiment similar to that described in (A) but with treatment of the mice with an anti-asialo-GM1 pAbs or an anti-CD8α mAb one day before the initiation of immunotherapy. Graphs show tumor growth in each individual and combined survival curves. Log Rank test, ∗ p < 0.0016, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p = 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α V500 (53-6.7) , BD Biosciences , Cat#560776; RRID: AB_1937317.

Techniques:

Journal: Cell

Article Title: Anti-NKG2A mAb Is a Checkpoint Inhibitor that Promotes Anti-tumor Immunity by Unleashing Both T and NK Cells

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.014

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α V500 (53-6.7) , BD Biosciences , Cat#560776; RRID: AB_1937317.

Techniques: Purification, Recombinant, Selection, Staining, Software

Figure 3. Immunizations with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant signifi- cantly increases the density of CD8+ T cells that infiltrate into implanted MC38 tumors. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC-treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. As a control, mice were immunized with PBS as a negative control. Two weeks after the second immunization, mice were challenged with a subcuta- neous implantation of 1 × 106 cells of replication-capable MC38 CRC cells. MC38 tumors grown in these two groups of mice were surgically resected on Day 9, Day 11, and Day 15 after its challenge implantation, and those tumors were applied for immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8α antibodies. The density of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (numbers of those intratumoral T cells/mm2 of tumor) that had infiltrated into the tumors were counted microscopically by scanning each section of MC 38 tumors at 200× magnification from one end to the other end of the tumor sections at three different locations (approximately one fourth from the top of the section, the middle of the section, and three fourths from the top of the section). When the tumors are too small to measure the T cell numbers to scan at the three different locations described above, the scanning was performed at only the middle of the section or one third and two third from the top of the section. (A) The density of intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumors grown in the immunized and unimmunized mice. In the unimmunized control group, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and two mice on Day 15. In the immunized mice, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and one mouse on Day 15. The figure shows the data from all of these mice combined for each experimental group. (B) A representative image of CD8+ T cells detected within the tumors of the immunized and unimmunized mice on Day 9 after the implantation of the tumor cells. Arrows indicate CD8+ T cells detected. * p < 0.05. N.S., Not significant.

Journal: Cells

Article Title: A Novel Protozoa Parasite-Derived Protein Adjuvant Is Effective in Immunization with Cancer Cells to Activate the Cancer-Specific Protective Immunity and Inhibit the Cancer Growth in a Murine Model of Colorectal Cancer.

doi: 10.3390/cells13020111

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Immunizations with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant signifi- cantly increases the density of CD8+ T cells that infiltrate into implanted MC38 tumors. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC-treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. As a control, mice were immunized with PBS as a negative control. Two weeks after the second immunization, mice were challenged with a subcuta- neous implantation of 1 × 106 cells of replication-capable MC38 CRC cells. MC38 tumors grown in these two groups of mice were surgically resected on Day 9, Day 11, and Day 15 after its challenge implantation, and those tumors were applied for immunohistochemical staining with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8α antibodies. The density of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (numbers of those intratumoral T cells/mm2 of tumor) that had infiltrated into the tumors were counted microscopically by scanning each section of MC 38 tumors at 200× magnification from one end to the other end of the tumor sections at three different locations (approximately one fourth from the top of the section, the middle of the section, and three fourths from the top of the section). When the tumors are too small to measure the T cell numbers to scan at the three different locations described above, the scanning was performed at only the middle of the section or one third and two third from the top of the section. (A) The density of intratumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the tumors grown in the immunized and unimmunized mice. In the unimmunized control group, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and two mice on Day 15. In the immunized mice, there were three mice on Day 9, one mouse on Day 11, and one mouse on Day 15. The figure shows the data from all of these mice combined for each experimental group. (B) A representative image of CD8+ T cells detected within the tumors of the immunized and unimmunized mice on Day 9 after the implantation of the tumor cells. Arrows indicate CD8+ T cells detected. * p < 0.05. N.S., Not significant.

Article Snippet: The fixed tumors were embedded in paraffin, and sections (4 μm thickness) of the paraffin-embedded tumors were stained with anti-mouse CD4 or anti-mouse CD8α rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) using Ventana Discovery Ultra instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).

Techniques: Adjuvant, Control, Negative Control, Immunohistochemical staining, Staining

Figure 4. CD8+ T cells from mice immunized with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant secrete greater amounts of GzmB and IFN-γ in response to MMC-treated MC38 tumor cells in vitro. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC- treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. Two weeks after the second immunization, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were purified separately from their spleens (four mice) and pooled within each T cell population. Those T cell populations were then cultured (5 × 105 cells/well) with and without the presence of MMC-treated MC38 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) for 72 h. As a control, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from unimmunized mice were purified and cultured with and without MC38 cells in the same manner. There were five wells in the cultures in each experimental group. The concentration of (A) GzmB and (B) IFN-γ in their culture supernatants were measured with ELISA using commercial kits. The levels of these effector molecules in the CD8+ T cell cultures are indicated as relative values to those detected in the supernatants of these T cells from unimmunized mice cultured without MC38 CRC cells. In case of CD4+ T cells, the effector molecule levels are indicated as relative values to those detected in the cultures of these T cells without MC38 CRC cells for each of immunized and unimmunized mouse groups due to high background values in the cultures without MC38 cells in the immunized mouse group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. N.S., Not significant.

Journal: Cells

Article Title: A Novel Protozoa Parasite-Derived Protein Adjuvant Is Effective in Immunization with Cancer Cells to Activate the Cancer-Specific Protective Immunity and Inhibit the Cancer Growth in a Murine Model of Colorectal Cancer.

doi: 10.3390/cells13020111

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. CD8+ T cells from mice immunized with MMC-treated MC38 CRC cells plus 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant secrete greater amounts of GzmB and IFN-γ in response to MMC-treated MC38 tumor cells in vitro. C57BL/6 mice were immunized intraperitoneally with 1 × 106 cells of MMC- treated MC38 cells with 40 µg of rGRA6Nt adjuvant twice with a 4-week interval. Two weeks after the second immunization, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were purified separately from their spleens (four mice) and pooled within each T cell population. Those T cell populations were then cultured (5 × 105 cells/well) with and without the presence of MMC-treated MC38 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) for 72 h. As a control, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from unimmunized mice were purified and cultured with and without MC38 cells in the same manner. There were five wells in the cultures in each experimental group. The concentration of (A) GzmB and (B) IFN-γ in their culture supernatants were measured with ELISA using commercial kits. The levels of these effector molecules in the CD8+ T cell cultures are indicated as relative values to those detected in the supernatants of these T cells from unimmunized mice cultured without MC38 CRC cells. In case of CD4+ T cells, the effector molecule levels are indicated as relative values to those detected in the cultures of these T cells without MC38 CRC cells for each of immunized and unimmunized mouse groups due to high background values in the cultures without MC38 cells in the immunized mouse group. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. N.S., Not significant.

Article Snippet: The fixed tumors were embedded in paraffin, and sections (4 μm thickness) of the paraffin-embedded tumors were stained with anti-mouse CD4 or anti-mouse CD8α rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) using Ventana Discovery Ultra instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA).

Techniques: Adjuvant, In Vitro, Purification, Cell Culture, Control, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

A MC38 cells lacking Tak1 or B2m expression were pulsed with the MHC-I restricted chicken ovalbumin SIINFEKL peptide and subsequently cultured with increasing ratios of OT-I CD8 T cells, previously activated for 48 h by CD3 and CD28 stimulation. Tumor cell viability was assessed 24 h later by flow cytometry, using CD8 surface staining to discriminate T cells from tumor cells. B – D CD8 T cells isolated from naïve mouse spleens (Balb/c for CT-26 and EMT6, C57BL/6 for MC38) were activated by CD3 and CD28 stimulation in vitro and subsequently cultured with ( B ) MC38, ( C ) CT-26, or ( D ) EMT6 tumor cells lacking Tak1 expression. Viability was assessed using DRAQ7 uptake, imaging cells every 2 h for the indicated times. E – G Tak1- deficient MC38 ( E ) or CT-26 ( F ) cells were cultured in media derived from 48 h activated CD-8 T cells. Viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. G Conditioned media from 48 h activated CD8 T cells was added to EMT6 cells deficient for Tak1 , Tnfr1 , or Tak1 and Tnfr1 and viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. All panels represent the mean +/− SD from a single experiment, n = 2 independent experiments.

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Targeting tumor intrinsic TAK1 engages TNF-α-driven cell death through distinct mechanisms and enhances cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-08013-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: A MC38 cells lacking Tak1 or B2m expression were pulsed with the MHC-I restricted chicken ovalbumin SIINFEKL peptide and subsequently cultured with increasing ratios of OT-I CD8 T cells, previously activated for 48 h by CD3 and CD28 stimulation. Tumor cell viability was assessed 24 h later by flow cytometry, using CD8 surface staining to discriminate T cells from tumor cells. B – D CD8 T cells isolated from naïve mouse spleens (Balb/c for CT-26 and EMT6, C57BL/6 for MC38) were activated by CD3 and CD28 stimulation in vitro and subsequently cultured with ( B ) MC38, ( C ) CT-26, or ( D ) EMT6 tumor cells lacking Tak1 expression. Viability was assessed using DRAQ7 uptake, imaging cells every 2 h for the indicated times. E – G Tak1- deficient MC38 ( E ) or CT-26 ( F ) cells were cultured in media derived from 48 h activated CD-8 T cells. Viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. G Conditioned media from 48 h activated CD8 T cells was added to EMT6 cells deficient for Tak1 , Tnfr1 , or Tak1 and Tnfr1 and viability was assessed via DRAQ7 uptake. All panels represent the mean +/− SD from a single experiment, n = 2 independent experiments.

Article Snippet: For the CD8 depletion protocol, mice were injected with anti-mouse CD8 (BioXCell; BP0061, New Haven, CT) or IgG2a Isotype control (BioXCell; BP 00085) at 10 mg/kg i.p. at the dose schedule of Day -2, Day -1 prior to flank inoculation of cells, then again on Days 4, 8, and 11 post inoculation.

Techniques: Expressing, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Isolation, In Vitro, Imaging, Derivative Assay

A Immunocompetent mice (C57BL/6, n = 15/group) were implanted with pooled clones from Tak1 -deficient or parental MC38 cells and tumor growth was monitored. B , C Immunocompetent mice (BALB/c, n = 8/group) were implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 cells ( B ) and treated at the indicated days with an α-PD-1 antibody ( C , 10 mg/kg) and tumor growth was monitored. D Immunodeficient mice (NSG, n = 10/group) were implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 cells and tumor growth was monitored. E Quantification of the percentage of complete tumor clearance from panels ( B – D ). F Balb/c mice implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 tumors and exhibiting complete responses were rechallenged with CT-26 parental cells and tumor growth was monitored. Naïve mice challenged with parental CT-26 cells served as controls. G CT-26 parental and Tak1 -deficient tumor growth was monitored in Balb/c mice administered an α-CD8 depleting antibody for two sequential days prior to tumor engraftment and during tumor progression at the indicated days ( n = 10/group). H CT-26 parental and Tak1 -deficient tumor growth was assessed in Balb/c mice administered an α-TNF-α neutralizing antibody (15 mg/kg) at the indicated days ( n = 10/group). Tumor growth curves represent the mean tumor volume +/− SEM. Statistical differences between tumor volumes at the final measurement was determined using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple correction where * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and **** p < 0.0001 was considered significant.

Journal: Cell Death & Disease

Article Title: Targeting tumor intrinsic TAK1 engages TNF-α-driven cell death through distinct mechanisms and enhances cancer immunotherapy

doi: 10.1038/s41419-025-08013-0

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Immunocompetent mice (C57BL/6, n = 15/group) were implanted with pooled clones from Tak1 -deficient or parental MC38 cells and tumor growth was monitored. B , C Immunocompetent mice (BALB/c, n = 8/group) were implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 cells ( B ) and treated at the indicated days with an α-PD-1 antibody ( C , 10 mg/kg) and tumor growth was monitored. D Immunodeficient mice (NSG, n = 10/group) were implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 cells and tumor growth was monitored. E Quantification of the percentage of complete tumor clearance from panels ( B – D ). F Balb/c mice implanted with Tak1 -deficient CT-26 tumors and exhibiting complete responses were rechallenged with CT-26 parental cells and tumor growth was monitored. Naïve mice challenged with parental CT-26 cells served as controls. G CT-26 parental and Tak1 -deficient tumor growth was monitored in Balb/c mice administered an α-CD8 depleting antibody for two sequential days prior to tumor engraftment and during tumor progression at the indicated days ( n = 10/group). H CT-26 parental and Tak1 -deficient tumor growth was assessed in Balb/c mice administered an α-TNF-α neutralizing antibody (15 mg/kg) at the indicated days ( n = 10/group). Tumor growth curves represent the mean tumor volume +/− SEM. Statistical differences between tumor volumes at the final measurement was determined using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple correction where * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; and **** p < 0.0001 was considered significant.

Article Snippet: For the CD8 depletion protocol, mice were injected with anti-mouse CD8 (BioXCell; BP0061, New Haven, CT) or IgG2a Isotype control (BioXCell; BP 00085) at 10 mg/kg i.p. at the dose schedule of Day -2, Day -1 prior to flank inoculation of cells, then again on Days 4, 8, and 11 post inoculation.

Techniques: Clone Assay

(A–E) ATs from naïve C57BL/6 mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative plots of transcription factor expression or cytokine production by CD8+ or CD4+ T cells from the mAT after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA. (B) Numbers of CD8+ T cells and non-Treg CD4+ T cells from the mAT producing the indicated cytokine. (C) Frequencies of IFN-γ- and TNF-α-producing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA isolated from gAT, scAT, and mAT. (D) CD8+ (top) and CD4+ (bottom) T cells isolated from the mAT. Left: representative plots of CD44 and CD62L expression, Right: representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD44+CD62L− (red) or CD44−CD62L+ (blue) T cells. (E) Numbers of central memory (Tcm: CD44+CD62L+), effector memory (Tem: CD44+CD62L−CD69−) and resident memory (Trm: CD44+CD62L−CD69+) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells per gram of gAT, scAT, and mAT. (F) Conjoined pairs of naïve CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic C57BL/6 mice were analyzed 6 weeks after parabiosis surgery to quantify the origin of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets (described in (E)) in the spleen (Spl), mLN, siLP, and mAT. The percentage of cells originating from host (black bars) or donor (white bars) animals is shown. nd not detected. (G–K) mAT isolated from healthy rhesus macaques was analyzed by flow cytometry. (G) Representative plot (gated on CD3+CD8+ T cells) indicating the gating strategy for naïve (CD95−CD28lo), central memory or stem cell memory (Tcm/scm) (CD95+CD28+), and Tem/rm (CD95+CD28−) T cells. (H) Representative plots showing CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve, Tcm/scm, and Tem/rm T cells. (I) Representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve (shaded) and Tem/rm T cells (blue). (J) Frequencies of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets from (HI). (K) Representative plots (gated on CD3+ T cells) from concatenation of all samples, showing cytokine production by T cell subsets. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. In all bar graphs, error bars represent standard deviation. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with at least 4 mice, 3 pairs of parabiotic animals, or a total of 3 rhesus macaques. See Figure S1.

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–E) ATs from naïve C57BL/6 mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative plots of transcription factor expression or cytokine production by CD8+ or CD4+ T cells from the mAT after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA. (B) Numbers of CD8+ T cells and non-Treg CD4+ T cells from the mAT producing the indicated cytokine. (C) Frequencies of IFN-γ- and TNF-α-producing CD8+ and CD4+ T cells after PMA/ionomycin restimulation with BFA isolated from gAT, scAT, and mAT. (D) CD8+ (top) and CD4+ (bottom) T cells isolated from the mAT. Left: representative plots of CD44 and CD62L expression, Right: representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD44+CD62L− (red) or CD44−CD62L+ (blue) T cells. (E) Numbers of central memory (Tcm: CD44+CD62L+), effector memory (Tem: CD44+CD62L−CD69−) and resident memory (Trm: CD44+CD62L−CD69+) CD8+ and CD4+ T cells per gram of gAT, scAT, and mAT. (F) Conjoined pairs of naïve CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic C57BL/6 mice were analyzed 6 weeks after parabiosis surgery to quantify the origin of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets (described in (E)) in the spleen (Spl), mLN, siLP, and mAT. The percentage of cells originating from host (black bars) or donor (white bars) animals is shown. nd not detected. (G–K) mAT isolated from healthy rhesus macaques was analyzed by flow cytometry. (G) Representative plot (gated on CD3+CD8+ T cells) indicating the gating strategy for naïve (CD95−CD28lo), central memory or stem cell memory (Tcm/scm) (CD95+CD28+), and Tem/rm (CD95+CD28−) T cells. (H) Representative plots showing CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve, Tcm/scm, and Tem/rm T cells. (I) Representative histograms of CD69 expression on CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) naïve (shaded) and Tem/rm T cells (blue). (J) Frequencies of CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) memory T cell subsets from (HI). (K) Representative plots (gated on CD3+ T cells) from concatenation of all samples, showing cytokine production by T cell subsets. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. In all bar graphs, error bars represent standard deviation. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with at least 4 mice, 3 pairs of parabiotic animals, or a total of 3 rhesus macaques. See Figure S1.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Isolation, Standard Deviation

(A–D) C57BL/6 mice were orally infected with T. gondii. 6 weeks post-infection, T cell populations were evaluated by flow cytometry. (A) Number of IFN-γ+ CD8+ (left) and IFN-γ+ CD4+ (right) T cells from the mAT post PMA/ionomycin activation with BFA. (Student’s t test) (B) Representative plots show T. gondii-specific CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) T cells. (C) Representative plots of IFN-γ production by CD44+tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) after PMA/ionomycin stimulation with BFA in the indicated organ. (D) The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFN-γ+ tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and IFN-γ+ TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) from (C). (E–G) C57Bl/6 mice were orally infected with Yptb WT. At the indicated time points post-infection, T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells in the indicated organs at 15 days post-infection. (F) Time course of the numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells in the mLN, siLP, and mAT. (G) Frequencies of Tcm, Tem, and Trm cells within YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells in the mAT 31 days post-infection. (H–J) C57BL/6 mice were orally infected with Yptb WT or Yptb ΔyopM. At the indicated time points post-infection, T cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. (H) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from the mLN or mAT 31 days post-infection. (I) Numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from the mAT 31 days post-infection. (J) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells from the mAT and gAT >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM. (K) Representative plots of tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) from the gAT and mAT of mice >6 weeks post oral T. gondii infection. (L) Pairs consisting of one naïve and one previously infected (>4 weeks post Yptb ΔyopM infection) congenic C57BL/6 mouse were conjoined and analyzed 6 weeks after parabiosis surgery. The number of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells isolated from the indicated organs of the naive (white bars) or previously infected (black bars) mouse in the pair was calculated. (One way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons). Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with at least 3 mice per group or 3 pairs of parabiotic animals. ns not significant, *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S2.

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–D) C57BL/6 mice were orally infected with T. gondii. 6 weeks post-infection, T cell populations were evaluated by flow cytometry. (A) Number of IFN-γ+ CD8+ (left) and IFN-γ+ CD4+ (right) T cells from the mAT post PMA/ionomycin activation with BFA. (Student’s t test) (B) Representative plots show T. gondii-specific CD8+ (left) and CD4+ (right) T cells. (C) Representative plots of IFN-γ production by CD44+tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) after PMA/ionomycin stimulation with BFA in the indicated organ. (D) The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IFN-γ+ tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and IFN-γ+ TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) from (C). (E–G) C57Bl/6 mice were orally infected with Yptb WT. At the indicated time points post-infection, T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells in the indicated organs at 15 days post-infection. (F) Time course of the numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells in the mLN, siLP, and mAT. (G) Frequencies of Tcm, Tem, and Trm cells within YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells in the mAT 31 days post-infection. (H–J) C57BL/6 mice were orally infected with Yptb WT or Yptb ΔyopM. At the indicated time points post-infection, T cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry. (H) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from the mLN or mAT 31 days post-infection. (I) Numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from the mAT 31 days post-infection. (J) Representative plots of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells from the mAT and gAT >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM. (K) Representative plots of tgd057:Kb+ CD8+ T cells (left) and TGME49:I-Ab+ CD4+ T cells (right) from the gAT and mAT of mice >6 weeks post oral T. gondii infection. (L) Pairs consisting of one naïve and one previously infected (>4 weeks post Yptb ΔyopM infection) congenic C57BL/6 mouse were conjoined and analyzed 6 weeks after parabiosis surgery. The number of YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells isolated from the indicated organs of the naive (white bars) or previously infected (black bars) mouse in the pair was calculated. (One way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons). Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with at least 3 mice per group or 3 pairs of parabiotic animals. ns not significant, *p<0.05, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S2.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Infection, Flow Cytometry, Activation Assay, Fluorescence, Isolation, Standard Deviation

(A–B) Mice were orally infected with Yptb ΔyopM. >4 weeks post-infection, Tem and Trm memory CD8+ T cells were sorted for gene expression analysis by RNA-Seq. (A) Numbers of genes with a ≥2 fold increase (red) or decrease (blue) in expression levels between the indicated populations. (B) Pathway analysis was performed and gene pathways were organized into clusters, represented here as clustergrams showing gene pathways differentially regulated between Trm cells in the siLP and mAT. (C–G) Mice infected with Yptb ΔyopM were analyzed at >4 weeks post-infection. (C) Ki67 expression by Tem and Trm YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells was determined by flow cytometric analysis. Left hand plots show YopE:Kb+ expression on CD8+ T cells. Center plots show CD69 expression on YopE:Kb+CD8+ cells. Right hand plots show Ki67 expression on Tem and Trm cells. Bar graphs show frequencies of Ki67+YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem (left) and Trm (right) cells. (D) Representative Vybrant DyeCycle Violet staining of YopE:Kb+CD44+CD8+ T cells from the siLP (blue), spleen (green), and mAT (red). Bar graphs show the percentage of YopE:Kb+CD44+CD8+ Tem and Trm cells in the indicated cell cycle stages in the siLP (left), spleen (center), and mAT (right). (E) >4 weeks post-infection with the Yptb ΔyopM, mice received BrdU for 12 days. The percentage of BrdU+YopE:Kb+CD44+ CD8+ T cells found in the intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL), lungs, salivary gland (SG), siLP, liver, mAT, and gAT is quantified in the bar graph. (F) >4 weeks post-infection, cells from the siLP, spleen, and mAT were incubated with Bodipy FL C16. Representative histogram indicates Bodipy uptake in YopE:Kb+CD8+ Trm cells (red) or YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem cells (blue) from the siLP (open) and mAT (shaded). Bar graphs show the quantification of the bodipy MFI. (Student’s t test). (G) >4 weeks post-infection, cells from the siLP, spleen, and mAT were incubated with Mitotracker Deep Red. Representative histograms indicate Mitotracker Deep Red staining in YopE:Kb+CD8+ Trm cells (red) or YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem cells (blue) from the siLP (open histogram) and mAT (shaded histograms). Bar graphs show the quantification of the Mitotracker Deep Red MFI. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all graphs represent mean±SD. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with ≥3 mice per group. One way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 See Figure S3.

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–B) Mice were orally infected with Yptb ΔyopM. >4 weeks post-infection, Tem and Trm memory CD8+ T cells were sorted for gene expression analysis by RNA-Seq. (A) Numbers of genes with a ≥2 fold increase (red) or decrease (blue) in expression levels between the indicated populations. (B) Pathway analysis was performed and gene pathways were organized into clusters, represented here as clustergrams showing gene pathways differentially regulated between Trm cells in the siLP and mAT. (C–G) Mice infected with Yptb ΔyopM were analyzed at >4 weeks post-infection. (C) Ki67 expression by Tem and Trm YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells was determined by flow cytometric analysis. Left hand plots show YopE:Kb+ expression on CD8+ T cells. Center plots show CD69 expression on YopE:Kb+CD8+ cells. Right hand plots show Ki67 expression on Tem and Trm cells. Bar graphs show frequencies of Ki67+YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem (left) and Trm (right) cells. (D) Representative Vybrant DyeCycle Violet staining of YopE:Kb+CD44+CD8+ T cells from the siLP (blue), spleen (green), and mAT (red). Bar graphs show the percentage of YopE:Kb+CD44+CD8+ Tem and Trm cells in the indicated cell cycle stages in the siLP (left), spleen (center), and mAT (right). (E) >4 weeks post-infection with the Yptb ΔyopM, mice received BrdU for 12 days. The percentage of BrdU+YopE:Kb+CD44+ CD8+ T cells found in the intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL), lungs, salivary gland (SG), siLP, liver, mAT, and gAT is quantified in the bar graph. (F) >4 weeks post-infection, cells from the siLP, spleen, and mAT were incubated with Bodipy FL C16. Representative histogram indicates Bodipy uptake in YopE:Kb+CD8+ Trm cells (red) or YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem cells (blue) from the siLP (open) and mAT (shaded). Bar graphs show the quantification of the bodipy MFI. (Student’s t test). (G) >4 weeks post-infection, cells from the siLP, spleen, and mAT were incubated with Mitotracker Deep Red. Representative histograms indicate Mitotracker Deep Red staining in YopE:Kb+CD8+ Trm cells (red) or YopE:Kb+CD8+ Tem cells (blue) from the siLP (open histogram) and mAT (shaded histograms). Bar graphs show the quantification of the Mitotracker Deep Red MFI. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all graphs represent mean±SD. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with ≥3 mice per group. One way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 See Figure S3.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Infection, Gene Expression, RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Staining, Incubation

(A–D) Mice were either naïve, 6 days post-infection with Yptb (Yptb WT 6 days), >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM (Yptb ΔyopM), or >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM followed by challenge with Yptb for 6 days (Yptb ΔyopM + Yptb WT) before imaging or isolation of cells for flow cytometry. (A) Representative images of the entire mAT from actin-DsRed reporter mice are shown. White arrows indicate FALCs. (B) Number of FALCs per mAT represented as fold change over the number of FALCs per naïve mAT. (C) mATs from CD11c–YFP reporter mice were stained for CD8 and LYVE-1 and imaged by confocal microscopy. CD8, CD11c, and LYVE-1 staining (top) or CD8+ T cells alone (bottom) in areas of the mAT with (left) or without (right) FALCs are shown. (D) Numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from mAT. (E) Pooled mAT, scAT and gAT isolated from either naïve donors or donors >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM were subcutaneously transplanted into Rag1−/− mice. Rag1−/− mice receiving ATs from previously infected mice were either left untreated or injected with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 depleting antibodies. 2 weeks post surgery, animals were challenged i.v. with 200 CFU of Yptb WT. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with ≥5 mice per group. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation. Statistical comparisons in (B) and (D) were performed using one way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. Statistical comparisons in (E) were performed using Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test. ns not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S4.

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–D) Mice were either naïve, 6 days post-infection with Yptb (Yptb WT 6 days), >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM (Yptb ΔyopM), or >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM followed by challenge with Yptb for 6 days (Yptb ΔyopM + Yptb WT) before imaging or isolation of cells for flow cytometry. (A) Representative images of the entire mAT from actin-DsRed reporter mice are shown. White arrows indicate FALCs. (B) Number of FALCs per mAT represented as fold change over the number of FALCs per naïve mAT. (C) mATs from CD11c–YFP reporter mice were stained for CD8 and LYVE-1 and imaged by confocal microscopy. CD8, CD11c, and LYVE-1 staining (top) or CD8+ T cells alone (bottom) in areas of the mAT with (left) or without (right) FALCs are shown. (D) Numbers of CD44+YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells from mAT. (E) Pooled mAT, scAT and gAT isolated from either naïve donors or donors >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM were subcutaneously transplanted into Rag1−/− mice. Rag1−/− mice receiving ATs from previously infected mice were either left untreated or injected with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 depleting antibodies. 2 weeks post surgery, animals were challenged i.v. with 200 CFU of Yptb WT. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with ≥5 mice per group. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation. Statistical comparisons in (B) and (D) were performed using one way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. Statistical comparisons in (E) were performed using Log-rank (Mantel Cox) test. ns not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S4.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Infection, Imaging, Isolation, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Confocal Microscopy, Injection, Standard Deviation

(A–B) >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM, mice were injected i.v. with YopE69–77 peptide or vehicle control (ctrl.) and evaluated by flow cytometry 1 hour post-injection. (A) Representative histogram shows expression of CD69 on YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells after vehicle control (dotted line) or peptide (gray shading) injection (left) and MFI of CD69 in the indicated organs after the indicated treatment is quantified (right). (B) Representative plots show IFN-γ and TNF-α production by YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells 1 hour after vehicle control (left) or peptide (right) injection in the indicated organs. Frequencies of IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells in the indicated organs are shown in the bar graph. (C) Mice were infected orally with a fluorescent reporter strain of T. gondii. 6 weeks post-infection, mice were injected i.v. with MHC-I and MHC-II peptides or vehicle control and analyzed by flow cytometry 1 hour post injection. Representative plots show IFN-γ and TNF-α in CD44+CD8+ T cells in the indicated organ. Bar graphs show the frequencies of IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells within the CD44+ CD8+ T cells. (D–E) >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM, mice were injected i.v. with YopE69-77 peptide or an equal volume of vehicle control and evaluated by flow cytometry at 1 and 4 hours post-injection. (D) Representative plots show neutrophils in the indicated organs (gated on live CD45+TCRβ−Siglec F−NK1.1−B220− cells) 4 hours after injection. Bar graph shows frequency of neutrophils at 1 and 4 hours post-injection in the siLP and mAT. (E) Representative plots show monocytes (gated on live CD45+TCR-β−Siglec F−NK1.1−B220−CD11b+Ly-6G−CD64+CCR2+ cells) 4 hours after injection in the indicated organs. Bar graph shows the frequency of monocytes at 1 and 4 hours post-injection in the siLP and mAT. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation and statistics are calculated using one way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with 2–6 mice per group. ns not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S5.

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A–B) >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM, mice were injected i.v. with YopE69–77 peptide or vehicle control (ctrl.) and evaluated by flow cytometry 1 hour post-injection. (A) Representative histogram shows expression of CD69 on YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells after vehicle control (dotted line) or peptide (gray shading) injection (left) and MFI of CD69 in the indicated organs after the indicated treatment is quantified (right). (B) Representative plots show IFN-γ and TNF-α production by YopE:Kb+CD8+ T cells 1 hour after vehicle control (left) or peptide (right) injection in the indicated organs. Frequencies of IFN-γ+ TNF-α+ YopE:Kb+ CD8+ T cells in the indicated organs are shown in the bar graph. (C) Mice were infected orally with a fluorescent reporter strain of T. gondii. 6 weeks post-infection, mice were injected i.v. with MHC-I and MHC-II peptides or vehicle control and analyzed by flow cytometry 1 hour post injection. Representative plots show IFN-γ and TNF-α in CD44+CD8+ T cells in the indicated organ. Bar graphs show the frequencies of IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells within the CD44+ CD8+ T cells. (D–E) >4 weeks post-infection with Yptb ΔyopM, mice were injected i.v. with YopE69-77 peptide or an equal volume of vehicle control and evaluated by flow cytometry at 1 and 4 hours post-injection. (D) Representative plots show neutrophils in the indicated organs (gated on live CD45+TCRβ−Siglec F−NK1.1−B220− cells) 4 hours after injection. Bar graph shows frequency of neutrophils at 1 and 4 hours post-injection in the siLP and mAT. (E) Representative plots show monocytes (gated on live CD45+TCR-β−Siglec F−NK1.1−B220−CD11b+Ly-6G−CD64+CCR2+ cells) 4 hours after injection in the indicated organs. Bar graph shows the frequency of monocytes at 1 and 4 hours post-injection in the siLP and mAT. Numbers in representative plots indicate mean±SD. Error bars in all bar graphs represent standard deviation and statistics are calculated using one way Anova adjusted for multiple comparisons. Data are representative of at least 2 experiments with 2–6 mice per group. ns not significant, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001. See Figure S5.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Infection, Injection, Control, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Standard Deviation

DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY

Journal: Immunity

Article Title: The white adipose tissue is a reservoir for memory T cells that promotes protective memory responses to infection

doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.009

Figure Lengend Snippet: DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse CD8α (2.43) (depletion) , BioXcell , BE0061.

Techniques: Software, Virus, Recombinant, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Isolation, SYBR Green Assay, Staining, Microarray

Fig. 1 Pharmacological inhibition of BCL9 induces tumor regression and increases antigen presentation. a The BCL9 expression between tumors and normal tissues in TCGA COAD datasets (Normal, n = 41; Tumor, n = 462). b The antigen processing and presentation signature (left) and HLA-I signature (right) between low and high BCL9 expression (median value) in TCGA COAD datasets (BCL9Low , n = 209; BCL9High, n = 236). c Tumor growth of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (n = 6). d Tumor growth of MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation (n = 6). e Heatmap of the genes included in the GO:0019882 from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors (Vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). f, g The relative expression of Tap1, Tap2, B2m and Psmb9 of tumors from hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (f) and MC38 tumor- bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (g) analyzed by qPCR (n = 4–7). h–k Representative plot (h, j) and quantitative analysis (i, k) of OVA257-264-specific CD8+ T cells in TILs of tumors from MC38-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (h, i) and hsBCL9z96-treated MC38- OVA tumor-bearing mice (j, k) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3). l Tumor growth of C57BL/6 WT (n = 6) and Batf3−/−mice (n = 5) that had been injected subcutaneously with MC38 tumor cells and were treated i.p. with vehicle or 40 mg/kg hsBCL9z96 every day for 2 weeks. These data are representative values expressed as the mean ± SD of each group; n indicates biological replicate; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Unpaired Student’s t test (a, b, i, k); Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (c, d, f, g)

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 Pharmacological inhibition of BCL9 induces tumor regression and increases antigen presentation. a The BCL9 expression between tumors and normal tissues in TCGA COAD datasets (Normal, n = 41; Tumor, n = 462). b The antigen processing and presentation signature (left) and HLA-I signature (right) between low and high BCL9 expression (median value) in TCGA COAD datasets (BCL9Low , n = 209; BCL9High, n = 236). c Tumor growth of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (n = 6). d Tumor growth of MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation (n = 6). e Heatmap of the genes included in the GO:0019882 from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors (Vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). f, g The relative expression of Tap1, Tap2, B2m and Psmb9 of tumors from hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (f) and MC38 tumor- bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (g) analyzed by qPCR (n = 4–7). h–k Representative plot (h, j) and quantitative analysis (i, k) of OVA257-264-specific CD8+ T cells in TILs of tumors from MC38-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (h, i) and hsBCL9z96-treated MC38- OVA tumor-bearing mice (j, k) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation and analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3). l Tumor growth of C57BL/6 WT (n = 6) and Batf3−/−mice (n = 5) that had been injected subcutaneously with MC38 tumor cells and were treated i.p. with vehicle or 40 mg/kg hsBCL9z96 every day for 2 weeks. These data are representative values expressed as the mean ± SD of each group; n indicates biological replicate; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001; Unpaired Student’s t test (a, b, i, k); Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (c, d, f, g)

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Inhibition, Immunopeptidomics, Expressing, Cytometry, Injection

Fig. 2 Inhibition of BCL9/BCL9L enhances cDC1 activation and facilitates cross-priming of CD8+ T cells. a, b CD40 (left) and CD86 (right) expression by CD103+ cDC1 of TdLNs (a) and tumors (b) from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3-4). c, d CD40 (left) and CD86 (right) expression by CD103+ cDC1 of TdLNs (c) and tumors (d) from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3–4). e The representative plot of OT-I CD8+ T cells in TdLNs from hsBCL9z96-treated MC38-OVA tumor- bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry. f and g Quantitative analysis of the percentage of OT-I CD8+ T cells (f) and CFSE dilution of OT-I CD8+ T cells (mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) (g) based on the result of (e) (n = 3). h The representative plot of OT-I CD8+ T cells in TdLNs from MC38-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, and +6 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry. i, j Quantitative analysis of the percentage of OT-I CD8+ T cells (i) and CFSE dilution of OT-I CD8+ T cells (j) based on the result of (h) (n = 3). These data are representative values expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates. An unpaired Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis of the data in groups a–d, f, g, i, and j

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2 Inhibition of BCL9/BCL9L enhances cDC1 activation and facilitates cross-priming of CD8+ T cells. a, b CD40 (left) and CD86 (right) expression by CD103+ cDC1 of TdLNs (a) and tumors (b) from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3-4). c, d CD40 (left) and CD86 (right) expression by CD103+ cDC1 of TdLNs (c) and tumors (d) from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3–4). e The representative plot of OT-I CD8+ T cells in TdLNs from hsBCL9z96-treated MC38-OVA tumor- bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry. f and g Quantitative analysis of the percentage of OT-I CD8+ T cells (f) and CFSE dilution of OT-I CD8+ T cells (mean fluorescent intensity, MFI) (g) based on the result of (e) (n = 3). h The representative plot of OT-I CD8+ T cells in TdLNs from MC38-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, and +6 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry. i, j Quantitative analysis of the percentage of OT-I CD8+ T cells (i) and CFSE dilution of OT-I CD8+ T cells (j) based on the result of (h) (n = 3). These data are representative values expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates. An unpaired Student’s t test was used for statistical analysis of the data in groups a–d, f, g, i, and j

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Inhibition, Activation Assay, Expressing, Cytometry, Standard Deviation, Derivative Assay

Fig. 3 Single-cell transcriptional profiling of CD8+ T cells and cDC1 in tumors and TdLNs from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9/Bcl9l deficiency mice. a Illustration of experiment and analysis process of single-cell transcriptional analysis. b TSNE plots of clustering process and marker genes (Zbtb46 for DCs, Cd68 for myeloid cells, Mlana for B16-OVA tumor cells, Cd3e for T cells, Cd4 for CD4+ T cells and Cd8a for CD8+ T cells) in tumors from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6 and +11 post inoculation. c–e TSNE plots of DC reclustering (c, e) and marker genes (Xcr1 for cDC1 and Clec10a for cDC2) (d) in tumors from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 Single-cell transcriptional profiling of CD8+ T cells and cDC1 in tumors and TdLNs from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9/Bcl9l deficiency mice. a Illustration of experiment and analysis process of single-cell transcriptional analysis. b TSNE plots of clustering process and marker genes (Zbtb46 for DCs, Cd68 for myeloid cells, Mlana for B16-OVA tumor cells, Cd3e for T cells, Cd4 for CD4+ T cells and Cd8a for CD8+ T cells) in tumors from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6 and +11 post inoculation. c–e TSNE plots of DC reclustering (c, e) and marker genes (Xcr1 for cDC1 and Clec10a for cDC2) (d) in tumors from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Marker

Fig. 4 Bcl9/Bcl9l deficient cDC1 are superior to WT cDC1 in activation, antigen presentation and cross-priming of CD8+ T cells. a Expression of genes related to cDC1 maturation and antigen presentation in tumors and TdLNs from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/f

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4 Bcl9/Bcl9l deficient cDC1 are superior to WT cDC1 in activation, antigen presentation and cross-priming of CD8+ T cells. a Expression of genes related to cDC1 maturation and antigen presentation in tumors and TdLNs from B16-OVA tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f mice and Bcl9f/f

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Activation Assay, Immunopeptidomics, Expressing

Fig. 6 Targeting of BCL9/BCL9L increases cDC1 accumulation in tumors through XCL1-XCR1 axis. a Gating strategy of XCR+ cDC1 (CD45+ CD11b−CD11c+ MHC-II+ CD103+ XCR1+) in TILs. b The XCR+ cDC1 in TILs of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (left) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/fCre-ERT2 mice (right) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). c iCD103+ DC migration toward XCL1 for 3 h by trans well assay (n = 3). d Heatmap of the genes included in GO:0070098 of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors (vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). e, f Xcl1 mRNA (left) and XCL1 protein (right) levels in tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (e) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/fCre-ERT2 mice (f) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4-5). g, h Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of XCL1 expression of CD8+ T cells and NK cells in TILs from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). g Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of XCL1 expression among CD8+ T cells and NK cells in TILs from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). h Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates; Unpaired Student’s t test (b, c, e, f); Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (g, h)

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6 Targeting of BCL9/BCL9L increases cDC1 accumulation in tumors through XCL1-XCR1 axis. a Gating strategy of XCR+ cDC1 (CD45+ CD11b−CD11c+ MHC-II+ CD103+ XCR1+) in TILs. b The XCR+ cDC1 in TILs of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (left) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/fCre-ERT2 mice (right) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). c iCD103+ DC migration toward XCL1 for 3 h by trans well assay (n = 3). d Heatmap of the genes included in GO:0070098 of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors (vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). e, f Xcl1 mRNA (left) and XCL1 protein (right) levels in tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (e) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/fCre-ERT2 mice (f) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4-5). g, h Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of XCL1 expression of CD8+ T cells and NK cells in TILs from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). g Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of XCL1 expression among CD8+ T cells and NK cells in TILs from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation were analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). h Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates; Unpaired Student’s t test (b, c, e, f); Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (g, h)

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Cytometry, Migration, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Standard Deviation, Derivative Assay

Fig. 7 Targeting BCL9/BCL9L results in CD8+ T cells accumulation in tumors through CXCL9-CXCR3 axis. a Significantly upregulated GO terms related to IFN-γ response of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors are depicted (vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). b and c Relative Ifng mRNA (left) and IFN-γ protein (right) levels in tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (b) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (c) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4–7). d, e Relative Cxcl9 mRNA (left) and CXCL9 protein (right) expression of tumors from 30 mg/ kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (d) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (e) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/ 100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4-7). f Assessment of CD8+ T cell migration toward CXCL9 or with the indicated doses of antibodies or chemokine for 4 h by trans well assay (n = 3). g Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of CXCL9 expression in cDC1 of tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3–4). h Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of CXCL9 expression in cDC1 of tumors from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9/Bcl9l deficiency mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). i The expression of CXCR3 in CD8+ T cells of tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (left) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (right) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates; Unpaired Student’s t test (b–e, g–i); One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (f)

Journal: Signal transduction and targeted therapy

Article Title: Targeting BCL9/BCL9L enhances antigen presentation by promoting conventional type 1 dendritic cell (cDC1) activation and tumor infiltration.

doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01838-9

Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 7 Targeting BCL9/BCL9L results in CD8+ T cells accumulation in tumors through CXCL9-CXCR3 axis. a Significantly upregulated GO terms related to IFN-γ response of 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumors are depicted (vehicle, n = 4; hsBCL9z96, n = 5). b and c Relative Ifng mRNA (left) and IFN-γ protein (right) levels in tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (b) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (c) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4–7). d, e Relative Cxcl9 mRNA (left) and CXCL9 protein (right) expression of tumors from 30 mg/ kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (d) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (e) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/ 100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by qPCR and ELISA, respectively (n = 4-7). f Assessment of CD8+ T cell migration toward CXCL9 or with the indicated doses of antibodies or chemokine for 4 h by trans well assay (n = 3). g Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of CXCL9 expression in cDC1 of tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 3–4). h Representative plot (left) and quantitative analysis (right) of CXCL9 expression in cDC1 of tumors from MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9/Bcl9l deficiency mice analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). i The expression of CXCR3 in CD8+ T cells of tumors from 30 mg/kg hsBCL9z96-treated CT26 tumor-bearing mice (left) and MC38 tumor-bearing Bcl9f/fBcl9lf/f Cre-ERT2 mice (right) treated i.p. with tamoxifen (1 mg/100 μL) in olive oil on days −7, −6, −5, +1, +6, and +11 post inoculation analyzed by flow cytometry (n = 4). Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for each group, derived from three independent experiments; “n” denotes the number of biological replicates; Unpaired Student’s t test (b–e, g–i); One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni test (f)

Article Snippet: For CD4 and CD8 T cells depletion, individual mice were injected i.p. with anti-mouse CD4 monoclonal antibodies (Abs) (100 μg/100 μL; BE0003-1, BioXcell) or anti-mouse CD8 Abs (100 μg/100 μL; BE0004-1, BioXcell) on days +2, +4, +6, +8 and +10 after inoculation.

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Expressing, Migration, Cytometry, Standard Deviation, Derivative Assay

METTL3 is highly expressed in tumors and is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. (A) Flowchart for screening key N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification genes related to immunotherapy response in bladder cancer (BLCA). (B) Pearson correlation analysis bar chart of the 10 target genes with the percentage of complete response (CR) patients to immunotherapy in the IMvigor210 cohort, and a scatter plot of METTL3 expression level versus CR patient percentage. (C) Proportion of immunotherapy responses among different Lund subtypes in the IMvigor210 cohort. (D) Violin plot of METTL3 expression levels in bladder tissues of patients with different Lund subtypes. (E–F) Expression and statistical analysis of METTL3 in normal and tumor cells from single-cell sequencing of clinical bladder cancer samples. Histogram of METTL3 expression levels in cancer tissues versus adjacent normal tissues in (G) non-paired samples and (H) paired samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer cohort. (I) Representative immunohistochemistry staining of METTL3 in clinical BLCA samples. (J–K) Scatter plots of METTL3 expression levels with CD8+T cell, cytotoxic cell, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration levels based on ssGSEA algorithm and TIMER V.2.0 database. (L) Statistical plot of METTL3 expression levels and immune scores in BLCA from the CAMOIP database. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: METTL3 promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in bladder cancer via m6A-dependent CXCL5/CCL5 regulation

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011108

Figure Lengend Snippet: METTL3 is highly expressed in tumors and is associated with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. (A) Flowchart for screening key N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification genes related to immunotherapy response in bladder cancer (BLCA). (B) Pearson correlation analysis bar chart of the 10 target genes with the percentage of complete response (CR) patients to immunotherapy in the IMvigor210 cohort, and a scatter plot of METTL3 expression level versus CR patient percentage. (C) Proportion of immunotherapy responses among different Lund subtypes in the IMvigor210 cohort. (D) Violin plot of METTL3 expression levels in bladder tissues of patients with different Lund subtypes. (E–F) Expression and statistical analysis of METTL3 in normal and tumor cells from single-cell sequencing of clinical bladder cancer samples. Histogram of METTL3 expression levels in cancer tissues versus adjacent normal tissues in (G) non-paired samples and (H) paired samples from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer cohort. (I) Representative immunohistochemistry staining of METTL3 in clinical BLCA samples. (J–K) Scatter plots of METTL3 expression levels with CD8+T cell, cytotoxic cell, and myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) infiltration levels based on ssGSEA algorithm and TIMER V.2.0 database. (L) Statistical plot of METTL3 expression levels and immune scores in BLCA from the CAMOIP database. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0146), anti-mouse CD8α antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0061), and anti-mouse Gr-1 antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0075) were also dissolved in PBS and administered intraperitoneally.

Techniques: Modification, Expressing, Sequencing, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Derivative Assay

METTL3 regulates bladder cancer progression by chemotactic CD8+T cell infiltration through the IGF2BP1-AHR-CCL5 axis. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the screening process for key transcription factors regulated by METTL3-mediated m6A modification and involved in CCL5 transcription. (B) Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of AHR and CCL5 mRNA expression levels after AHR knockdown in MB49 cells. (C) Assessment of CCL5 mRNA expression levels after overexpression of METTL3 and/or knockdown of AHR in MB49 cells. (D) Schematic representation of AHR binding sites within the CCL5 promoter region as predicted by JASPAR. (E) CHIP-qPCR analysis of AHR enrichment at the CCL5 promoter region. (F) mRNA and (G) protein expression levels of AHR after METTL3 knockdown in MB49 cells. (H) Peak plot of m6A modification sites in AHR in MB49 cells. (I) MeRIP-qPCR analysis showing changes in AHR m6A modification levels following METTL3 knockdown in MB49 cells. (J) RIP-qPCR analysis of METTL3 enrichment in AHR mRNA in MB49 cells. (K) MeRIP-qPCR showing changes in AHR m6A modification levels after treatment with the METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 in MB49 cells. (L) RT-qPCR analysis of AHR mRNA levels after STM2457 treatment to inhibit METTL3 in MB49 cells. (M) RNA decay assay showing AHR mRNA stability after silencing METTL3. (N) RNA decay assay showing AHR mRNA stability after treatment with METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 (2 µg/mL, 72 hours) in MB49 cells. (O) RT-qPCR analysis of IGF2BP1 and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after silencing IGF2BP1. (P) RT-qPCR analysis of IGF2BP2 and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after silencing IGF2BP2. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of METTL3, IGF2BP1, and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after overexpression of METTL3 and/or silencing of IGF2BP1. (R) Images of tumors formed by MB49 stable cell lines (control, AHR overexpression, METTL3 knockdown, METTL3 knockdown with AHR overexpression) subcutaneously implanted into the backs of C57BL/6J mice. (S) Growth curves of mouse bladder cancer tumors. (T) Volume of mouse bladder cancer tumors. (U) Schematic of the animal experiment. (V) Images of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (W) Growth curves of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (X) Tumor weights of bladder cancer tumors in mice; ns, no significance. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: METTL3 promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in bladder cancer via m6A-dependent CXCL5/CCL5 regulation

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011108

Figure Lengend Snippet: METTL3 regulates bladder cancer progression by chemotactic CD8+T cell infiltration through the IGF2BP1-AHR-CCL5 axis. (A) Venn diagram illustrating the screening process for key transcription factors regulated by METTL3-mediated m6A modification and involved in CCL5 transcription. (B) Reverse Transcription Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of AHR and CCL5 mRNA expression levels after AHR knockdown in MB49 cells. (C) Assessment of CCL5 mRNA expression levels after overexpression of METTL3 and/or knockdown of AHR in MB49 cells. (D) Schematic representation of AHR binding sites within the CCL5 promoter region as predicted by JASPAR. (E) CHIP-qPCR analysis of AHR enrichment at the CCL5 promoter region. (F) mRNA and (G) protein expression levels of AHR after METTL3 knockdown in MB49 cells. (H) Peak plot of m6A modification sites in AHR in MB49 cells. (I) MeRIP-qPCR analysis showing changes in AHR m6A modification levels following METTL3 knockdown in MB49 cells. (J) RIP-qPCR analysis of METTL3 enrichment in AHR mRNA in MB49 cells. (K) MeRIP-qPCR showing changes in AHR m6A modification levels after treatment with the METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 in MB49 cells. (L) RT-qPCR analysis of AHR mRNA levels after STM2457 treatment to inhibit METTL3 in MB49 cells. (M) RNA decay assay showing AHR mRNA stability after silencing METTL3. (N) RNA decay assay showing AHR mRNA stability after treatment with METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 (2 µg/mL, 72 hours) in MB49 cells. (O) RT-qPCR analysis of IGF2BP1 and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after silencing IGF2BP1. (P) RT-qPCR analysis of IGF2BP2 and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after silencing IGF2BP2. (Q) RT-qPCR analysis of METTL3, IGF2BP1, and AHR mRNA expression levels in MB49 cells after overexpression of METTL3 and/or silencing of IGF2BP1. (R) Images of tumors formed by MB49 stable cell lines (control, AHR overexpression, METTL3 knockdown, METTL3 knockdown with AHR overexpression) subcutaneously implanted into the backs of C57BL/6J mice. (S) Growth curves of mouse bladder cancer tumors. (T) Volume of mouse bladder cancer tumors. (U) Schematic of the animal experiment. (V) Images of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (W) Growth curves of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (X) Tumor weights of bladder cancer tumors in mice; ns, no significance. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0146), anti-mouse CD8α antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0061), and anti-mouse Gr-1 antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0075) were also dissolved in PBS and administered intraperitoneally.

Techniques: Modification, Reverse Transcription, Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Knockdown, Over Expression, Binding Assay, ChIP-qPCR, Stable Transfection, Control

Targeting METTL3 enhances the efficacy of anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy in bladder cancer. (A) Control and METTL3-knockdown MB49 stable cell lines were subcutaneously injected into mice. Anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days) was administered intraperitoneally starting on day 6. Tumors were harvested on day 12 for flow cytometric analysis of the immune microenvironment (n=5). (B–D) Images, growth curves, and tumor weights of subcutaneous bladder cancer tumors in mice. (E–F) Flow cytometric analysis of MDSCs and CD8+T cell infiltration levels in the tumor tissues of mouse bladder cancer. (G) Wild-type MB49 cells were subcutaneously injected into mice, and on day 6, the mice were randomly divided into groups. Treatment included anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally), IgG antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally), the METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 (250 µg/tumor, once daily, intratumorally), and a combination of STM2457 and anti-PD-1 antibody. (H, J) Images, growth curves, and tumor weights of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (K) Control or METTL3 knockdown MB49 stable cell lines were orthotopically injected into the mouse bladder wall to establish an orthotopic bladder cancer model. Anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally) or IgG antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally) was administered starting on day 6 (n=5). (L) In vivo imaging system (IVIS) Living imaging of tumor growth in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (M) Images of orthotopic bladder cancer tumors in mice. (N) Statistical analysis of fluorescence signal values from IVIS Living imaging on day 16. (O) Tumor volume in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (P) Tumor weight in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (Q) Schematic diagram of the study content. ns, no significance. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: METTL3 promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment in bladder cancer via m6A-dependent CXCL5/CCL5 regulation

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011108

Figure Lengend Snippet: Targeting METTL3 enhances the efficacy of anti-Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy in bladder cancer. (A) Control and METTL3-knockdown MB49 stable cell lines were subcutaneously injected into mice. Anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days) was administered intraperitoneally starting on day 6. Tumors were harvested on day 12 for flow cytometric analysis of the immune microenvironment (n=5). (B–D) Images, growth curves, and tumor weights of subcutaneous bladder cancer tumors in mice. (E–F) Flow cytometric analysis of MDSCs and CD8+T cell infiltration levels in the tumor tissues of mouse bladder cancer. (G) Wild-type MB49 cells were subcutaneously injected into mice, and on day 6, the mice were randomly divided into groups. Treatment included anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally), IgG antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally), the METTL3 inhibitor STM2457 (250 µg/tumor, once daily, intratumorally), and a combination of STM2457 and anti-PD-1 antibody. (H, J) Images, growth curves, and tumor weights of bladder cancer tumors in mice. (K) Control or METTL3 knockdown MB49 stable cell lines were orthotopically injected into the mouse bladder wall to establish an orthotopic bladder cancer model. Anti-PD-1 antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally) or IgG antibody (200 µg/mouse, every 3 days, intraperitoneally) was administered starting on day 6 (n=5). (L) In vivo imaging system (IVIS) Living imaging of tumor growth in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (M) Images of orthotopic bladder cancer tumors in mice. (N) Statistical analysis of fluorescence signal values from IVIS Living imaging on day 16. (O) Tumor volume in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (P) Tumor weight in the orthotopic bladder cancer model. (Q) Schematic diagram of the study content. ns, no significance. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

Article Snippet: Anti-mouse Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 (PD-1) antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0146), anti-mouse CD8α antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0061), and anti-mouse Gr-1 antibody (Bioxcell, #BE0075) were also dissolved in PBS and administered intraperitoneally.

Techniques: Control, Knockdown, Stable Transfection, Injection, In Vivo Imaging, Imaging, Fluorescence